71.66 1.24 1.21 0.03 3.49 0.01 13.69 0.15 1638.17 six.53 A. fulica four.88 0.01 two.27 0.16 62.56 1.23 0.03 0.01 three 0.01 27.29 1.21 1611.44 8.6 Shell (mean SD) A. CYP3 Activator web marginata 0.27 0.04 0.68 0.05 two.1 0.41 0.five 0.05 96.31 0.01 0.64 0.03 71.74 1.49 A. achatina 0.43 0.13 0.59 0.03 three.18 0.58 0.63 0.02 94.85 0.11 0.95 0.01 92.04 1.57 A. fulica 0.21 0.01 0.62 0.13 two.06 0.25 0.36 0.04 95.85 0.08 1.26 0.02 79.38 1.SD – Normal deviation.Table two. Mineral composition inside the meat and shell of A. achatina, A. marginata and a. fulica.Mineral Meat (mean SD) A. marginata Na K Ca Mg P Zn Fe Mn Cu 67.64 0.19 111.43 0.46 701.79 four.32 308.7 0.42 268.53 five.34 8.41 0.12 six.33 0.05 0.73 0.04 0.98 0.03 A. achatina 58.09 0.12 114.65 0.44 656.9 5.46 304.62 0.19 241.9 11.3 six.28 0.1 5.75 0.05 0.17 0.03 0.73 0.02 A. fulica 73.38 0.27 111.02 0.three 402.29 5.18 301.2 0.33 61.29 11.34 five.81 0.1 26.64 0.26 1.29 three.83 0.08 Shell (imply SD) A. marginata five.92 0.04 24.95 0.31 13716.09 99.56 50.09 0.53 BDL BDL 1.37 0.04 0.33 0.01 BDL A. achatina six.82 7.29 22.32 0.15 14188.53 607.three 65.06 0.99 BDL 0.3 0.01 two.34 0.09 0.14 0.04 BDL A. fulica 21.83 0.15 26.41 0.26 14375 288.89 119.71 0.81 BDL BDL 3.8 0.08 BDL BDLConcentrations are in mg/100 g standard deviation; BDL – below detection limit.Table three. Pearson’s correlation matrix of proximate and nutrient elements in the meat and shell of A. achatina, A. marginata and a. fulica species.Moisture Fat Protein Fibre Ash Carbohydrate Energy Na K Ca Mg P Zn Fe Mn Cu Fat 1 0.641 0.95 0.768 -0.756 0.887 -0.91 0.762 0.929 0.687 0.937 0.439 -0.977 -0.96 -0.Protein 1 0.848 0.001 -0.987 0.923 -0.266 -0.008 0.88 0.998 0.87 0.971 -0.791 -0.401 -0.FibreAshCarbohydrateEnergyNaKCaMgPZnFeMn0.852 0.144 0.646 0.99 -0.301 0.513 -0.992 0.988 0.597 0.204 0.614 -0.097 -0.72 -0.964 -0.1 0.53 -0.922 0.987 -0.736 0.523 0.998 0.879 0.999 0.697 -0.995 -0.825 -0.989 1 -0.162 0.386 -0.964 1 0.477 0.062 0.495 -0.238 -0.613 -0.917 -0.651 1 -0.973 0.417 -0.152 -0.945 -0.995 -0.937 -0.92 0.878 0.542 0.854 1 -0.616 0.377 0.995 0.945 0.993 0.804 -0.965 -0.722 -0.951 1 -0.962 -0.692 -0.324 -0.707 -0.028 0.801 0.99 0.829 1 0.468 0.053 0.487 -0.247 -0.606 -0.913 -0.644 1 0.907 1 0.74 -0.987 -0.788 -0.978 1 0.898 0.955 -0.826 -0.455 -0.798 1 0.726 -0.99 -0.801 -0.982 1 -0.621 -0.17 -0.582 1 0.878 0.999 1 0.Correlation is considerable in the 0.05 level (2-tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)ponents (Computer) with Eigenvalues greater than 1. Component loadings of 0.5, 0.5 and 0.five signify poor, moderate and high loadings. The PCA results inside the shells and meat of A. achatina, A. marginata and a. fulica ERK1 Activator review species are offered in Figure two. three.5. Estimated day-to-day intake The EDI of Mn, Cu, Fe and Zn was estimated depending on the imply concentration of every single trace element in a. achatina, A. marginata in addition to a. fulica species and also the final results are presented in Table five.4. Discussion Snails’ development functionality and nutritional value enhanced by feeding them a compounded balanced eating plan wealthy in vitamins, energy, protein and calcium. This study compared the mineral content and proximate composition with the shell and meat of the 3 land snail species with these of other studies. To the greatest of our knowledge, this really is one of only several papers that take care of the flesh high quality qualities and shell characterisation of snail species obtained from the Kumasi Central Market place in Ghana. The decision to gather snail samples at twoM.A. Nkansah et al.Heliyon 7 (2021) eTable 4. Pearson’s correlation matrix
